IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima-signaling] comments on GRASP-07 draft

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 01 October 2016 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima-signaling@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-signaling@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B374E12B105 for <anima-signaling@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 12:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61cDtui_jJR9 for <anima-signaling@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 12:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A65512B02E for <anima-signaling@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 12:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A74920183; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 15:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5D76392C; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 15:17:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <65513C08-6CB0-4028-8C33-FC593DC1CB92@tzi.org>
References: <27023.1475255753@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <57EEA05D.8060009@tzi.org> <b6a19953-05e0-df9c-ae5d-dd439848f011@gmail.com> <65513C08-6CB0-4028-8C33-FC593DC1CB92@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 15:17:27 -0400
Message-ID: <5545.1475349447@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-signaling/PohPlkAHYgTjFFsvA1I75-wmpzI>
Cc: anima-signaling <anima-signaling@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima-signaling] comments on GRASP-07 draft
X-BeenThere: anima-signaling@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the signaling design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-signaling.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-signaling>, <mailto:anima-signaling-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-signaling/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-signaling@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-signaling-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-signaling>, <mailto:anima-signaling-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 19:17:30 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > Right. I think these expansions should be related to an appendix, and we
    > don't need very many of them. They still may be useful for CBOR newbies to
    > confirm their suspicions.

Exactly, a few (<5) worked through examples so that people writing code have some
test vectors to feed in.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email