Re: [Anima-signaling] Unsolicited discovery [was GRASP issue 50: Rapid mode]

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

Thats fine too. Can we walk through an example set of elements in such
a message ?

Also: If we use Flood Synchronization, it sounds as if we would not need
Rapid mode to make that work. In which case my other comment re. Rapid Mode
might apply: unless we find a good example use-case within our existing or
likely near term charter scope, maybe move Rapid mode down into an appendix ?

Cheers
    Toerless

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 05:18:53PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 01/08/2016 21:19, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> 
> ...
> > 
> > - Aka: I could happily let go of rapid-mode for now in the general case
> >   (move into appendix as "candidate extension"), and just figure out how
> >   we can include unsolicited synchronization data into unsolicited discovery
> >   messages.
> 
> We theoretically had unsolicited discovery responses in the design for a while but
> never worked out details. They vanished when we added Flood Synchronization
> which is an unsolicited announcement. It sends an objective tagged with its source
> address. It's pretty much the same thing you are asking for.
> 
>     Brian