Re: [Anima] Content-Transfer-Encoding and HTTP 1.x in ANIMA BRSKI

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 13 June 2019 11:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CED1202C0 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 04:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ymRvHEnlLuL3 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 04:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AAC41202BB for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 04:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1519; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1560424817; x=1561634417; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=F8gUGXLPo8Sf1l6VTvqcKUqk66DDpj7lN6NDPMX0UMU=; b=BHrcgvwnvncthjq9TfFD9ZRoUhCJVYqMj2o/0ipPjatcTT4Otra0Slnw r1l76e7a4IgzO8uV6DKN2gTZWoIu78UGI8cw4btcOUXbX/cEeMmc6XpBr R8V0EGKdeKfW7ZLs/J3wmpl1crAfppS59ZFkxgzVGd2FIc4GUC1SdMF5e U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,369,1557187200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="13117205"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Jun 2019 11:20:15 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-101-199.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-101-199.cisco.com [10.61.101.199]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5DBKDtL022123 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:20:14 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <AD4DC1AA-C332-4BC7-B095-0CDD30700B99@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ED1D5ED7-D6D5-48BF-9687-DCA15A2F6A4B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:20:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: <F896BCBC-6C32-4107-B4B5-C12617F81326@tzi.org>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, draft-ietf-pkix-est@ietf.org, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>, "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <32410.1560275231@localhost> <15839.1560351718@localhost> <8a538f76-787d-de13-97f1-16195daae8ce@gmx.de> <F896BCBC-6C32-4107-B4B5-C12617F81326@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.101.199, dhcp-10-61-101-199.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/-WLBGWe-PHi88kcLXW-KnRTmzjA>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Content-Transfer-Encoding and HTTP 1.x in ANIMA BRSKI
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:20:20 -0000

I am looking at libest and it certainly generates the header.

> On 13 Jun 2019, at 08:27, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On Jun 12, 2019, at 19:26, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> 2) Assuming the answer to (1) is no, what should we make of RFC7030
>>>   that says to use it, and to base64 binary objects?
>> 
>> Raise an erratum :-).
> 
> Not sure about the smiley here.  This is an erratum.
> Now how to resolve this depends on what option causes the smallest damage.
> 
> RFC 7030 is supposed to be a widely deployed protocol, so it should not be hard to find out what people out there are actually doing.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima