IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Anima] Re: Sheng: Early IANA review for draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03 please

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 12 July 2024 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4159C1D52FD for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l8UFaCYTSS-C for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0958C1D5319 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1246F3899C; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:12:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4nxlAHnE-Glw; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:12:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100413899B; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:12:30 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1720811550; bh=K7LEpVX1RYyAL49xdIXpwo9ZDTj1Zf1YK8MSw1U67fU=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=S8cdnzjgd8zseU3+Jz3wmO5zXaGqqzfDXnXwFbRM9QmSCWeV+enVSTCxzFylD3oaA +cncsQHnBMo5MFFQliuKzGeAGobu0crZZAy1bEqGwj9tGzDmGP0wt04NNWLR/QTBJV YOk2EHL4cf0M88EyiQGKuiKOeTEHj66xeB7MF+kWW37ud/g1c4g95W/PNob+3DX8QJ SwWM8k0UGiCOCOp2FDf94BsOM0raO2ar2nI0yxlQUtyk7VX7LShDsYdcBM6yBXg4Zp 5lIGwZUZGswZkAePhS26ecCRF9/xkPxR4Fq12WZ2N9XMffwyjtY+ONWqNg1t5icCGV Wgm4yP+Y2vknw==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EAB880; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:12:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Sheng JIANG <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <BE52529394F25339+01c101dad378$ae560460$0b020d20$@bupt.edu.cn>
References: <ZotAGhiJRua526ve@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <BE52529394F25339+01c101dad378$ae560460$0b020d20$@bupt.edu.cn>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:12:29 -0400
Message-ID: <9439.1720811549@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: FHMBNYG2HNY35R7LR7DQNQHOZYLAFYTB
X-Message-ID-Hash: FHMBNYG2HNY35R7LR7DQNQHOZYLAFYTB
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: 'Toerless Eckert' <tte@cs.fau.de>, anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] Re: Sheng: Early IANA review for draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03 please
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/-zPusFPrWiK9DHRQFiE9IqYAb10>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>

Sheng JIANG <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn> wrote:
    > I think the action of asking for IANA early review should only be done
    > when the document was getting into the late stage of WG document, like
    > in WGLC or close to WGLC. This document has just been adapted last IETF
    > and submitted as a WG document first time in this April. It even has
    > not be presented as a WG document for once. I think it is too early to
    > take this action. Bottom line, I would like to hear the WG response in
    > IETF 120.

a) we don't have to be beholden to IETF meetings and schedules.  We do things
   on the list.  It would be really really nice if more documents were
   discussed on the list.

b) the content of brski-discovery has been in other documents since 2018.

c) the point of brski-discovery is really to collect enough related IANA
   information into one place so that it can be sanely reviewed.  Getting
   IANA to tell us if we got it right early allows us to continue.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status