Return-Path: X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8B5C1CAE7F; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:27:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.407 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbwX1BoGsWkf; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83724C15155F; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0B33898B; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:27:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GDimKZ343eHG; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:27:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9181638988; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:27:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1720027624; bh=NS7lWpvRmdFGhCLT/9bMWtzCjEx6Jz+rHdDWImlTByo=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=KmC0lDB/98+Zu6dvGvPk6+gzBbTuLTSK25VZ8G8jfFfXRRcpu7XOmVhbqcjQPZtia GIhNwbeyLSlfMpZvP3x/tnZAD4Lgi2aaUo7nuNbtYwQePaPDqZOsWHOomeKnYLVme9 wB/JS7YyN5yWjodRROpKZ3rygQb79NFJzE4hpLoAV+2aI2bRhvTFWApV3jWukhpGGU grRTVkz8pX6VHSvVx9X3ajKcMPXkRpIFSuDUTIwdx8XvBTAXrt/k+RvnSI9bIVFYBB 5KDOSUng9o63PspIJsEpMBM+WK92VHcIJelKGpAM0R3ok93k3AiFQ5EggztaEfNn9/ z+VyU6kwRl4xg== Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB9910F; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:27:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Toerless Eckert , anima@ietf.org In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:27:04 -0400 Message-ID: <19585.1720027624@obiwan.sandelman.ca> Message-ID-Hash: 6MRZQX72INRZ7WRV6KE54U5IRIEDZF7E X-Message-ID-Hash: 6MRZQX72INRZ7WRV6KE54U5IRIEDZF7E X-MailFrom: mcr@sandelman.ca X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Amanda Baber via RT , draft-ietf-core-sid.all@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher.all@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BAnima=5D_Re=3A_=5BIANA_=231367443=5D_YANG_SID_Range_allocation_?= =?utf-8?q?for_draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher?= List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: {seems like this ought to be on the ANIMA@ list} Toerless Eckert wrote: > In other words: If you from IANA want to consider those allocations = to > be early and then to be removed > if the early allocation should expire, that's fine, but that does no= t need to impact the > RFC-ed queue of I-D.ietf-core-sid, right ? That's exactly what has occured. The RFC-ed Q has changed. We are now at the point where we can actually do it as an early allocation= , so IANA would prefer it if we did, so that their database/process will mat= ch.