IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] representing ACP info in X.509 certs

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sun, 21 June 2020 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11EF3A0803 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WzzlwrmWQMk4 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3225A3A07F9 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id i27so15505332ljb.12 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wVqySJiflhlDzsr2RTgT1KNfM17eKj0vlRFVOx0KJuU=; b=yP8/gxJSHV2u37t/v5CxRn+cji53ySogSUGk4elIZNIPEfbMw1EHiEBZN7Pd81ckI+ jkJONZ+28vfwQhVg3tbY5EifISyqdLJ183AcDzTNp3i+dfSxw4lHWU+ekF3IbBbxO/GA Ipmnu8OG1+pep+CKzOzwd+2Om+KrU4jsYG+yAw6vIhlzSpPMBgByhYl/bOA5Q3nxaFS6 +CdoFwPfpxfSXvpzJoROLZIQtXOeRsGKa1qB3Qc7MszzIjjSLeGnR2aEKHjHjr7fejks tFVwFhq7vXpSUo2RMEL792JGmRD/J6Ml/Y4dKZ0QatLnd9hqMIi3j6HKt1T2exKPcxZk WOfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wVqySJiflhlDzsr2RTgT1KNfM17eKj0vlRFVOx0KJuU=; b=IFT2R9Gfs4+l/17OrEQXH2NzNjHYQsUM8FspGitzr/PAt5JgblPEjKBRsMPk07fsQ3 WwUUEsPfRsdznQD2qB7hsUVeFDwgqtNBALcSlXKtFpbJ6zZBGoGO7En3+0aXPw4OjLKF ZlXbL0PYjtmS8jKXqk96+odBQ/2tp9yfi4VZjjJwoOAw4g2wpL4M7Rwa2aR6GBzMDE/T EeAMlKzpLONLVYJTY4DsVBUnpJJY97k5KfRhptF1WZsCGxxUzsrJh6edNu1Il/1hZvcF CjJ2EbWsa1rOqcf2Y8EoBYKnr8CZDLBVoP5KYnbf9zSzlqkKmu0Puh27dWtb9DBEFHAf 6a3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532w1cg+TzzrhR/sM8sJytg9oRm4Gu/coJ0gHSO0cbjzD/7Cp5qs dmb6o5UdiqVZRPvuGjD2t8LW0oNYOR7QtIjU0Cs+3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5avmH/bBuDiRPlDz5lPRrukvXft52iUO2GUo6jZR5EtotftYUmzEZaMlJ/O2ZH9Kvg/8hWpsymx4h4RHW3ig=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d98:: with SMTP id c24mr4764830ljj.17.1592702773284; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ece7aed3-ede3-5546-4586-1d98d3f71183.ref@verizon.net> <ece7aed3-ede3-5546-4586-1d98d3f71183@verizon.net>
In-Reply-To: <ece7aed3-ede3-5546-4586-1d98d3f71183@verizon.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 18:25:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMncZSQOfYsoVS-ZZoSbqZGOg+vQ41OdzAejrRfVozhyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Kent <stkent=40verizon.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000008e56505a88e03cb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/5dQ5HiCEA3W0s5ponpF7jP_WIj0>
Subject: Re: [Anima] representing ACP info in X.509 certs
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:26:17 -0000

This matches my understanding as well.

One thing that's not clear to me: is the expectation that you will be using
a public CA or that you will be using an enterprise-level one?

-Ekr


On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:03 PM Stephen Kent <stkent=
40verizon.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> My perspective matches what Russ & Ben have suggested, i.e., use of
> rfc822Name is inappropriate for this context. RFC 5280 is very clear
> about the intended use of the rfc822Name field in a cert and the proposed
> use in the anima context is inconsistent with 5280 text. A reasonable,
> appropriate way forward is to define a new otherName type for the anima
> context.
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email