[Anima] IPR poll for draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 19 April 2023 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F932C1516EA; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 09:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nnt4iWMPtkl7; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 09:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D07C14F736; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 09:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q1mDk71bYznkgk; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:18:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4Q1mDk6Xq3zkvdv; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:18:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:18:30 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae@ietf.org
Cc: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>, rwilton@cisco.com
Message-ID: <ZEAUVnNwuEwNVej8@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/6qNY4psljOI0OaPKuJtQdbh4b0o>
Subject: [Anima] IPR poll for draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:18:45 -0000

Dear subject draft authors and ANIMA WG:

I am working on the document shepherd for draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae. Here are the IPR question. The chairs must have answers for a) in order to forward this work (authors may reply to chairs only). If any one happens to know (b), then please reply to the chairs as well. Thanks!

(a) We need for each of the drafts authors to make an IPR statement about the draft (before it can proceed).

As applicable, for example:

  "I am not aware of any IPR against this document"

[ Note: if some IPR that was declared against other IETF documents also applies against this document, it needs to be re-declared for this document.]

(b) Dear ANIMA WG participants: if any of you has IPR knowledge against this document, now would be a good time to bring it up. The IETF IPR rules do ask you to do so:

https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/

"During the standards process any IETF contribution covered by patents or patent applications owned by a participant or their sponsor must be disclosed, or they must refrain from participating."

Aka: The only difference between authors and participants is that participants do not need to report that they are no aware of any IPR.

In general, you should not be unaware of IPR with your name on it.

Currently,  there are no IPR disclosures against BRSKI-AE, so there is now of course good time to check this voluntarily. 

Regards,
    Toerless