Return-Path: X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA5F1201E5 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REMEHQ-bxalI for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB8A1200FD for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0575B3808A; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:13:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98777AC2; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:13:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: "Joel M. Halpern" cc: Adam Roach , anima@ietf.org, Eliot Lear In-Reply-To: References: <156282703648.15280.17739830959261983790.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <17580.1562874933@localhost> <8869.1563140002@dooku.sandelman.ca> <376eee31-0264-38a8-1d32-901bb1a0671b@gmail.com> <9e341730-dc47-8860-47d4-6421ab04d0dc@nostrum.com> <6ecdae7f-4fb7-d9fc-f19f-bf742c6fe83c@joelhalpern.com> <193EB8D1-3E58-4570-AC4D-55737E3D36CF@cisco.com> <5240.1563306433@localhost> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Anima] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 21:13:20 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joel M. Halpern wrote: > Thank you Michael. I saw the proposed change in section 9. I wonder > if that is hiding the MUST, since the mechanisms are in section 7... > Having said that, I can live with it as you have proposed. I take your point. Options I see are: 1) swap the sections so section 9 (applicability) comes before 7 (reduced s= ecurity) 2) mention the ACP applicability in section 7. 3) move the 7.2 section to section 9. The intention with section 7 is to provide a palette of things, and let their use be dictated by how the protocol is applied. =2D-=20 ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh network= s [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect = [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails = [ =20 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAl0vj2kACgkQgItw+93Q 3WULwAf/c2LdaCacAEquOWgoRajbFn85CctGKKdznAL+l4ETm2Vj6ITKqw0l+mhv RCO4Tu5g7fqPzS1F/7rrQMCPvfb12DB/lhJ7efuDaOj1AlWcZFt6f5lLZtbEv9uP 1rkwisjIQ6TpF7ZvS96Jw9DH6mw38cLBXHpE+cFPtTmAjt7v/8qS51cLqeWrRKlB WjWJJtRAs+ZLmfB5pdUccdnNa1XnIH4i3OnUwaR2sS6M/JiiNWO52nJ34dHG2VZk 0aOaMhfUCxasK6m1bn/fKqqfU6fahvJjeTbtnrAbTOcDRC3/Gp9TRv9TdGINTRKP SNO3ixnqbFqiAIuKnFLm5fZ6Xh4U1Q== =cWp5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--