IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Russ: Re: rfc822Name use in Autonomic Control Plane document

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 29 June 2020 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF2F3A0EF6 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 06:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9h9EVtu6XRRz for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 06:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3E83A0EF3 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 06:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB76300B83 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:49:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 920eDk_RpjJW for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:49:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-72-66-113-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.113.56]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E42F8300AE4; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:49:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <72D84BE3-1928-4153-A5BF-9B4FC53E0245@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E5DB1C35-D331-4521-A473-71A8BEF3C25D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:49:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20200628161149.GA16571@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <9584c5cd-c68d-ddc3-0704-da672842e359@gmail.com> <FB6127DD-A111-4E40-A095-5E3C03AA6660@vigilsec.com> <9406.1592756905@localhost> <3A92516D-B980-4231-9059-EF7234BA8610@vigilsec.com> <20200627054056.GA35664@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <FF181E1F-2B93-47BB-AB45-7F66D880108B@vigilsec.com> <20200627224640.GA41058@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CABcZeBN_tQgH8ZZmVg82h8-cthm0uQ6b846N71G9NYFSxdUMRQ@mail.gmail.com> <e84cc89e-6503-7cd7-4281-9cf4629a7bb7@gmail.com> <3A5D70B2-B3F9-42A6-9219-F25D657A7A7F@vigilsec.com> <20200628161149.GA16571@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/AE1qoGDKAmErpIc_kn6rRSr_rvI>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Russ: Re: rfc822Name use in Autonomic Control Plane document
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:49:40 -0000

Toerless:

>> I think that everyone understands that at this point.
> 
> I do not understand how a recommendation like yours can raise to
> a blocking DISCUSS in an IESG review.

I was asked to go a review, and I did so.  As I said, I am quite sure that you and everyone else that is reading this thread understands the concern at this point.

In my opinion, and the opinion of a few others that have spoken on this list, the use of rfc822name is harmful.

Russ

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email