[Anima] Re: Sheng: Early IANA review for draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03 please
Sheng JIANG <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn> Thu, 11 July 2024 09:57 UTC
Return-Path: <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D04FC14F748 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rt9D9WL51YYW for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbgbr2.qq.com (smtpbgbr2.qq.com [54.207.22.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0366CC14F70B for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp86t1720691823teemew5b
X-QQ-Originating-IP: refevFQxdmqduQAQay9ETguVhXxSoWlJsGW1oFJVPDo=
Received: from SJUni ( [221.223.97.153]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:57:02 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 0000000000000000000000000000000
X-QQ-GoodBg: 0
X-BIZMAIL-ID: 1752061114954981465
From: Sheng JIANG <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
To: 'Toerless Eckert' <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <ZotAGhiJRua526ve@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <ZotAGhiJRua526ve@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:57:01 +0800
Message-ID: <BE52529394F25339+01c101dad378$ae560460$0b020d20$@bupt.edu.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMQ2n3rmyx3ZIMZuRFFqc/7KdrMwK+FONRw
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:bupt.edu.cn:qybglogicsvrsz:qybglogicsvrsz4a-1
Message-ID-Hash: OI5GIYR52LVH4XKZPO5NKSEYYZSGZEI4
X-Message-ID-Hash: OI5GIYR52LVH4XKZPO5NKSEYYZSGZEI4
X-MailFrom: shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] Re: Sheng: Early IANA review for draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03 please
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/AMQNGJSOxIFu91VXEM9Gw4KFvwI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>
Hi, Toerless, I think the action of asking for IANA early review should only be done when the document was getting into the late stage of WG document, like in WGLC or close to WGLC. This document has just been adapted last IETF and submitted as a WG document first time in this April. It even has not be presented as a WG document for once. I think it is too early to take this action. Bottom line, I would like to hear the WG response in IETF 120. Regards, Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org <forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org> On > Behalf Of 'Toerless Eckert' > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 9:26 AM > To: Sheng JIANG <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn> > Cc: anima@ietf.org > Subject: [Anima] Sheng: Early IANA review for > draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03 please > > Dear Sheng, > > (author hat on): > > It would be great if you (chair hat on) could ask for IANA early review of > draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03. The IANA section is requesting three tables > in on subsection of a registry (BRSKI), which i haven't seen done in before, so i > was wondering what IANA thinks about that. There is a note in the section for > IANA about this as well. > > Thanks a lot > Toerless > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to anima-leave@ietf.org
- [Anima] Sheng: Early IANA review for draft-ietf-a… 'Toerless Eckert'
- [Anima] Re: Sheng: Early IANA review for draft-ie… Sheng JIANG
- [Anima] Re: Sheng: Early IANA review for draft-ie… Michael Richardson