Return-Path: <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D04FC14F748
	for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001,
	RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
	by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Rt9D9WL51YYW for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>;
	Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbgbr2.qq.com (smtpbgbr2.qq.com [54.207.22.56])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0366CC14F70B
	for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp86t1720691823teemew5b
X-QQ-Originating-IP: refevFQxdmqduQAQay9ETguVhXxSoWlJsGW1oFJVPDo=
Received: from SJUni ( [221.223.97.153])
	by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with
	id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:57:02 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 0000000000000000000000000000000
X-QQ-GoodBg: 0
X-BIZMAIL-ID: 1752061114954981465
From: "Sheng JIANG" <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
To: "'Toerless Eckert'" <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <ZotAGhiJRua526ve@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <ZotAGhiJRua526ve@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:57:01 +0800
Message-ID: <BE52529394F25339+01c101dad378$ae560460$0b020d20$@bupt.edu.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMQ2n3rmyx3ZIMZuRFFqc/7KdrMwK+FONRw
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:bupt.edu.cn:qybglogicsvrsz:qybglogicsvrsz4a-1
Message-ID-Hash: OI5GIYR52LVH4XKZPO5NKSEYYZSGZEI4
X-Message-ID-Hash: OI5GIYR52LVH4XKZPO5NKSEYYZSGZEI4
X-MailFrom: shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0;
 nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size;
 news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BAnima=5D_Re=3A_Sheng=3A_Early_IANA_review_for_draft-ietf-anima-?=
	=?utf-8?q?brski-discovery-03_please?=
List-Id:  Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/AMQNGJSOxIFu91VXEM9Gw4KFvwI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>

Hi, Toerless,

I think the action of asking for IANA early review should only be done =
when the document was getting into the late stage of WG document, like =
in WGLC or close to WGLC. This document has just been adapted last IETF =
and submitted as a WG document first time in this April. It even has not =
be presented as a WG document for once. I think it is too early to take =
this action. Bottom line, I would like to hear the WG response in IETF =
120.

Regards,

Sheng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org <forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org> On
> Behalf Of 'Toerless Eckert'
> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 9:26 AM
> To: Sheng JIANG <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
> Cc: anima@ietf.org
> Subject: [Anima] Sheng: Early IANA review for
> draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03 please
>=20
> Dear Sheng,
>=20
> (author hat on):
>=20
> It would be great if you (chair hat on) could ask for IANA early =
review of
> draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03. The IANA section is requesting =
three tables
> in on subsection of a registry (BRSKI), which i haven't seen done in =
before, so i
> was wondering what IANA thinks about that. There is a note in the =
section for
> IANA about this as well.
>=20
> Thanks a lot
>     Toerless
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to anima-leave@ietf.org

