[Anima] possible last minute changes to anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra (was Re: Handling of endpoint path names (from BRSKI-AE discussion today))

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 04 August 2020 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEB93A0A4F for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 05:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.186
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.212, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vY4v9hv6xkK for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 05:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (minerva.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2a01:7e00::3d:b000]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0206A3A0A53 for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 05:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown []) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5591F47B; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:07:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id E1BE71A02CB; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:07:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "anima\@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, mnot@mnot.net
In-reply-to: <3f2d1790efb44ac39405a23dc592dd89@siemens.com>
References: <3f2d1790efb44ac39405a23dc592dd89@siemens.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com> message dated "Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:46:09 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:07:51 -0400
Message-ID: <13607.1596542871@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/BYpLzpiES1EcXos3vmTy-nNwAvg>
Subject: [Anima] possible last minute changes to anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra (was Re: Handling of endpoint path names (from BRSKI-AE discussion today))
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:07:59 -0000

Hi Mark, this concerns some desired changes to /.well-known/est.

Specifically, to move the things we did in anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra out
of /.well-known/est into a new /.well-known/brski.
The WG has not concluded to do this as yet, as the above document has passed
IESG review and is in MISREF at the RFC-EDITOR.

The thread starts at:

I have prepared sample changes which I'd like your opinion on.

1) I am now registering /.well-known/brski
2) I no longer need /.well-known/est to point to the new document.  Should I
   say this?
3) Am I creating the /.well-known/brski Registry correctly?
   I didn't see any other WK that have sub-registries.

This URL works:

But, includes a few small typos which were sent to the RFC-editor.

This should be the better DIFF:

but the DT/cache refuses to believe -42 exists yet, but maybe in 30 minutes
it will be okay.

Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-