Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 12 September 2017 20:51 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756661330DE for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Li-GhApl0dN for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2275E13239C for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E999D2009E; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:55:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5487280CFA; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:51:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
cc: anima@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8b165f89-3be1-c814-5a88-bf62f708972f@gmail.com>
References: <961.1504038708@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <BAA96F8A-C61E-4DE1-9837-7964A0E8B4A2@cisco.com> <2a1cf1e7-f668-cf76-d471-78585d7ad7ba@cisco.com> <8b165f89-3be1-c814-5a88-bf62f708972f@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:51:35 -0400
Message-ID: <27231.1505249495@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/C-4RCSTlCv4k5vb7zfCHtKpXU2A>
Subject: Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 20:51:37 -0000
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >> You need an MTI, and it should be the easiest and most compact thing to >> implement. While CoAP would be optimal, HTTP/1.1 is more than >> sufficient, and the features in 2 in this case are not only unnecessary, >> but undesirable overhead. > I am a bit bothered by the assumption that all devices of interest can be assumed > to include X, for whatever value of X we deem to be MTI. Or are you only > intending MTI to apply at the server end? We are running over HTTP 1.1, we have to assume that. The issue is that both client and server libraries will grow HTTP 2, and we need to know if this is a problem. > It seems to me that we want to minimise the requirements for low end pledge > devices, and every item that we make mandatory works against that. BRSKI does not target constrained devices; in the future having only an HTTP 2 library (because the application is using that) might be simplest. Is it going to work okay? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Max Pritikin (pritikin)
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Eliot Lear
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Eliot Lear
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Max Pritikin (pritikin)
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] two EST question/suggestions Brian E Carpenter