Re: [Anima] WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:56:39PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> RFC7915 obsoletes 6145, and there is also both:

That's the one i had used already in static-connectivity-05 as the primary reference.

> RFC7756:Stateless IP/ICMP Translation for IPv6 Internet Data Center
>              Environments (SIIT-DC): Dual Translation Mode
> 
> but specifically: rfc7755
> SIIT-DC: Stateless IP/ICMP Translation for IPv6 Data Center Environments
> 
> builds upon 7915.  which I suggest be mentioned.  They solve exactly the
> problem.   (I'm a big fan...)

When i was comparing the different solutions, i found RFC7757 to be
best suited in the case of ACP because of its flexibility. Thats
what i am referring to in stable-connectivity-05. I didn't find
that RFC7755 was adding any more benefits for the ACP NAT use case.

Check out the section about NAT in stable-connectivity-05 (or -06, unchanged).

Cheers
    Toerless

> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

Re: [Anima] WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03 - Respond by July 28, 2017