[Anima] changes in draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-10.txt

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

1. We have added Esko Dijk as an author.  Esko has been instrumental in
   getting this document focused and moving forward.  Thank you!

2. We reduced the number of mandatory exchanges, trying to optimize for
   common cases of small PKIs with common usage patterns.
   This makes the /crts optional in many cases.
   We changed /crts from returning application/pkcs7-mime;smime-type=certs-only
   to returning application/pkix-cert (for which we need a CoAP type code).

3. we removed the CoAP version of requestauditlog, as that is part of the
   BRSKI-MASA, (northbound) communication, which is always HTTPS, and is
   always non-constrained.

4. while we obligate the Registrar to support discovery via GET /.well-known/core?rt=brski*
   we do not obligate the pledge to use that, and mandate that the /.well-known/brski/xx
   targets are already supported by the Registrar.

5. We clarify how the desired pining by the MASA is to be signaled, and how
   it is to work for pinning of RPK.

6. We have excised all text relating to CMS signed CBOR.
   That involved returning the early allocation of CT=1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.46.

If you have not read the document recently, now would be a good time.
We have 17 open issues at https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues
and we expect to close them in the next ~6 weeks.

I see in reviewing the diff that there is a mistake in figure 1, with the use
of "Int"ermediate CA. We have concluded on using the term "Sub"ordinate CA.
Figure 2 gets that right.

[e-mail] wrote:
    >         Title : Constrained Voucher Artifacts for Bootstrapping
    > Protocols Authors : Michael Richardson Peter van der Stok Panos
    > Kampanakis Esko Dijk Filename :
    > draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-10.txt Pages : 50 Date :

    > Abstract: This document defines a protocol to securely assign a Pledge
    > to an owner and to enroll it into the owner's network.  The protocol
    > uses an artifact that is signed by the Pledge's manufacturer.  This
    > artifact is known as a "voucher".

...

    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-10


--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide