[Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8994 (7071)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 04 August 2022 14:57 UTC

To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: corey.bonnell@digicert.com, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, sbjarnason@arbor.net, anima@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220804145746.630CB4C0A4@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 07:57:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/DkZEFjaJ4FSxhXBMyBrn7BfnYxA>
Subject: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8994 (7071)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8994,
"An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7071

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Corey Bonnell <corey.bonnell@digicert.com>

Section: 6.2.2

Original Text
-------------
The acp-node-name in Figure 2 is the ABNF definition ("Augmented BNF
for Syntax Specifications: ABNF" [RFC5234]) of the ACP Node Name. An
ACP certificate MUST carry this information. It MUST contain an
otherName field in the X.509 Subject Alternative Name extension, and
the otherName MUST contain an AcpNodeName as described in
Section 6.2.2.

Corrected Text
--------------
The acp-node-name in Figure 2 is the ABNF definition ("Augmented BNF
for Syntax Specifications: ABNF" [RFC5234]) of the ACP Node Name. An
ACP certificate MUST carry this information. It MUST contain an
otherName field in the X.509 Subject Alternative Name extension, and
the otherName MUST contain an AcpNodeName as described in
Section 6.2.2.1.

Notes
-----
David von Oheimb discovered [1] that section 6.2.2 is self-referential and incorrect regarding the section reference to the ASN.1 module.

The correct section number is 6.2.2.1.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/-ymZk94KFzzolZSsJh6HONnypXQ/

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC8994 (draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-30)
--------------------------------------
Title : An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)
Publication Date : May 2021
Author(s) : T. Eckert, Ed., M. Behringer, Ed., S. Bjarnason
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
Area : Operations and Management
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG

[Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8994 (7071) RFC Errata System