IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] ANIMA-WG: pls chime in: early allocation for otherName code points (draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 02 July 2020 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463593A0C1B for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arbsBr3bZgbg for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AD483A0B4F for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DEA389CB for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:21:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qytObwPU2qdx for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C513389BB for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7995C5 for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:24:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: anima@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20200702132922.GA11404@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <20200702132922.GA11404@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 13:24:34 -0400
Message-ID: <23958.1593710674@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/EIzcrM09JJmT7T-_Vz4IxEi5GhM>
Subject: Re: [Anima] ANIMA-WG: pls chime in: early allocation for otherName code points (draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:24:48 -0000

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
    > would like to update implementation to use this new encoding for interop testing,
    > which requires allocation of two IANA code points (technically i think only one is
    > required for the implementation, but the toolchain would require both if i understand it
    > correctly).

If you use an ASN1 compiler for this, then yes.

If one does library calls to code that already processes otherName, then just
the IANA2 OID is needed, but I'm all for asking for both.

    > The early allocation process RFC7120 requires to vet the community for interest in the
    > early allocation, so pls. chime in with a +1, or if you must a -1 and explanation.

    > I'll do a +1 from the authors side.

    > The remaining requirements of RFC7120 for early allocations are AFAIK met.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email