Re: [Anima] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 12 July 2019 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CAA12047A; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rYwVFXMxw8M; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC07A120381; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x6C27kCa010436; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 22:07:46 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x6C27kCa010436
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1562897266; bh=q37NWJsL0UnMsISB/GPgUehxQGoOWNvFBphqjByt2pM=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kh0fP06OJM4LHlx4tND0htZMZrPOTkG+OIwrlAHrDAP/g0zOGIQJhRROluPBBHQfA zerVJaRV52+4uBOwEj02lSp/NMPfGCCLc2PI5ut7oDnppGACqbN+57NKScIJhKPydp xxKxDfHkdPnSocp0VOssngBZhalkJCYmmZS3lRzw=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x6C27h6f020112; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 22:07:43 -0400
Received: from MARCHAND.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.251]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 22:07:42 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra@ietf.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte+ietf@cs.fau.de>, "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVNzqofsCsqOReA0CZ18RZO6kzX6bElxCAgAGmCTA=
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 02:07:41 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B33CE3CD@marchand>
References: <156277529950.15124.2390956674545685683.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2520.1562791883@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <2520.1562791883@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/Fb0DL1ZivwbWgpKnvLy2bGEtdAE>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 02:08:02 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson [mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 4:51 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
> Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-
> keyinfra@ietf.org; Toerless Eckert <tte+ietf@cs.fau.de>; anima-
> chairs@ietf.org; anima@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-
> keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>     > (2) Section 5.8.1.  The format of the MASA audit log seems
>     > underspecified.  Is the JSON snippet presented here normative to
>     > describe the MASA audit log
>     > response?
> 
> Yes, it's intended to be normative.
> How can we make it clearer without over-engineering this, remembering
> that this is a PS, not IS, and the proof will be in the running-code.
> 
> Would you prefer to used CDDL or something like that to describe it?

CDDL would be very nice, but I have a much lower bar.  I would be happy with a full field list (e.g., I noticed that "version" isn't explained anywhere but appears in the examples; what's the format of the date?) and a statement that the log be structured per the JSON example. 

Roman

> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
>