Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-08.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 29 September 2017 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D470413214D; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUHYIcBaH1Vg; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F305813207A; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F6A200A1; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:30:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563698189F; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:24:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20170925201814.GB9705@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <150044138257.25233.12391471568614147773@ietfa.amsl.com> <f5e84812-c2fa-cc16-4105-20f7791110f4@gmail.com> <20170918060429.GC31832@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <11713.1506195333@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <235c34a0-415e-5580-7308-58cf19131f3d@gmail.com> <23496.1506346820@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <20170925201814.GB9705@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:24:56 -0400
Message-ID: <19014.1506705896@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/FxxKbDdQLKesFvwo_4uWT4SuYTU>
Subject: Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-08.txt
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:25:00 -0000

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
    > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
    brian> Toerless explained elsewhere why he thinks the duplication is
    brian> needed.
    >>
    >> I read that after my email.
    >> I simply can't agree.

    > I don't think i was suggesting duplication. I was suggesting for
    > one document to define an extensibel objective and the other draft to
    > extend it.

Objectives are so easy to define and require so little IANA coordination that
I don't see why we would want to extend it without also updating the BRSKI
document.

So to be clear: this is overly general, and I am opposed to this.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-