Re: [Anima] AD approval request for early allocation for id-ct-animaCBORVoucher

Muchas Gracias

Coupon redeemed as  [IANA #1160164] :

From: tte@cs.fau.de
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: Request for Assignment

Contact Name:
Toerless Eckert

Contact Email:
tte@cs.fau.de

Type of Assignment:
Early Assignment , approved by Warren Kumari
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/4JJjhztdmvh0uqvc0NuM4pIzhhE

Registry:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#security-smime-1

Description:
required for interop testing of prototypes implementing the subject WG
draft.

Additional Info:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-05#section-9.5

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:11:04AM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Approved.
> 
> (This approval coupon can be redeemed for a codepoint at any IANA location,
> or online. No warranty expressed or implied. Some rights reserved, some
> exclusions apply, etc :-))
> 
> W
> 
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:36 AM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Ignaz, dear Warren,
> >
> > As chairs of the ANIMA WG, we hereby request your AD approval
> > for early allocation of a code point from IANA according to RFC7120.
> >
> > Draft:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-05
> >
> > > ## The SMI Security for S/MIME CMS Content Type Registry
> > >
> > > This document registers an OID in the "SMI Security for S/MIME CMS
> > > Content Type" registry (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1), with the value:
> > >
> > >       Decimal  Description                             References
> > >       -------  --------------------------------------  ----------
> > >       TBD1      id-ct-animaCBORVoucher                 [ThisRFC]
> >
> > Registry:
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#security-smime-1
> >
> > The ANIMA WG chairs have verified that the required conditions for
> > early allocation from RFC7120, Section 2 are met:
> >
> > a) Standards Action (document is standards track ANIMA WG draft)
> >
> > b) The WG draft adequately describes the desired semantics:
> >    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-05
> >
> > c) The WG participants actively working on implementations of the
> >    draft have confirmed that the semantic of the code point is
> >    stable to the extend that it is clear that the final
> >    RFC will need it, but further validation through more interoperability
> >    testing is required and only blocked on the availability of an early
> > allocation
> >    code point.
> >
> > d) The working group chairs think that it would be highly helpful to
> >    receive an early allocation code point now to support further
> >    interoperability testing, ensuring that the final RFC has the
> >    highest level of practical vetting.
> >
> > The request for early allocation was brought up in the working group
> > and was faced with no disagreement. The working group chairs also
> > understand that there is no risk of depletion of the registry in question.
> >
> > Thank you very much
> >     Toerless (for the chairs)
> >
> > --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
> the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
> pants.
>    ---maf

> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de