IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] last minute changes to BRSKI to do endpoint discovery

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 26 July 2020 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E723A149B for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 14:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PnB89RfrFAEK for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 14:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 635A93A1495 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 14:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86D138A5C; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:13:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mNmKzTpXW-Ch; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:13:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B31738A5A; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:13:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E3C1AA; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:33:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: "Brockhaus, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <6971.1595562387@localhost>
References: <4a3b24b3737f4dcbbf3154c89d9c8200@siemens.com> <17250.1594397451@localhost> <a26f70c7dc5145b581f71ece3106529b@siemens.com> <26733.1595375481@localhost> <AM0PR10MB3153F5AA4119DBDDB97F6D06FE790@AM0PR10MB3153.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <6971.1595562387@localhost>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:33:55 -0400
Message-ID: <28226.1595799235@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/IezsflZqYdJi0O_vHRHfcnCbY_o>
Subject: Re: [Anima] last minute changes to BRSKI to do endpoint discovery
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 21:33:59 -0000

Would BRSKI-AE want to do CoAPS instead of HTTPS?
Or in addition to HTTPS?

I propose to leave base HTTPS BRSKI as-is, and then do whatever renames you
like by merging BRSKI-AE into constrained-voucher, and all all of the
asynchronous efforts over CoAP.

This has the interesting possibilities of supporting BRSKI-AE CoAP over BTLE,
NFC, and SMS. (not necessarily with an IP layer)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email