IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] $transport-proto in BRSKI

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 08 March 2019 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA8131426 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:03:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1k-PeL4fNra for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08CF012AF80 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:03:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D1E38263; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 13:02:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id E0DB21C29; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 13:03:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6A41B9D; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 13:03:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
cc: anima@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <bfba6194-6dcf-cab9-f20c-b1336fa48012@gmail.com>
References: <24947.1551476067@localhost> <9f6549c6-46a9-6a97-48c0-422cedf33512@gmail.com> <bfba6194-6dcf-cab9-f20c-b1336fa48012@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:03:06 -0500
Message-ID: <5500.1552068186@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/K34VqTxFQTpWaJO--ZZhT8FmLkc>
Subject: Re: [Anima] $transport-proto in BRSKI
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 18:03:11 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Sigh. I was wrong. The $ sign is legal CDDL:

    >> Per convention, CDDL extension points are marked with a leading
    >> dollar sign (types) or two leading dollar signs (groups).
    > [draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-07]

    > It isn't *required* but it shows that the item in question is expected
    > to be extended in future.

    > So either include it or don't, but at the moment there's a nit in
    > your text: the syntax says
    >> transport-proto /= IPPROTO_TCP
    > but the following paragraph says:
    >> The $transport-proto above indicates the method...

    > Otherwise, fwiw I'm happy with bootstrapping-keyinfra-19.

I noticed that extra $ when reading the diff, and removed it.
I will put them all it back: I found another location where it belongs.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email