[Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6642)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 14 July 2021 17:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A699F3A0D93 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtAnrGzdCFsg for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7ADC3A0D8E for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 34EFBF4074E; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: pritikin@cisco.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, jiangsheng@huawei.com, tte@cs.fau.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mcr@sandelman.ca, anima@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210714174701.34EFBF4074E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:47:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/KBEQ7D5sJPHvmpNsa_5ysEyhBoA>
Subject: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6642)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:47:11 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995, "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6642 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Section: 5.4 Original Text ------------- Use of TLS 1.3 (or newer) is encouraged. TLS 1.2 or newer is REQUIRED. TLS 1.3 (or newer) SHOULD be available. Corrected Text -------------- TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] with SNI support [RFC6066] is REQUIRED if TLS 1.3 is not available. The Server Name Indicator (SNI) is required when the Registrar communicates with the MASA in order for the MASA to be hosted in a modern multi-tenant TLS infrastructure. Notes ----- https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/bqrZXAk7vstWQ3V1-irIATnBKpY/ This adds new references to the text. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45) -------------------------------------- Title : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI) Publication Date : May 2021 Author(s) : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6642) RFC Errata System