IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 15 July 2019 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A24712011C; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id riUk9FDk5F_N; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC86120099; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.0.10] (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x6FFq7jH018194 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:52:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1563205928; bh=tz+Khkmdx6B6KSgNYSGIc+70Ydhya+LqbtvWk3lOPe8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=gqN2/fn6Waxzhk/0Z2QfiCcVIT44uLNTeYb3KNdr0B2wEpoOlFXMuEK6NjgSg8KV0 9PCCLx6sYNJE8HxX0TZlMuT5MtK5W5C12sQRL8gcQmqB4GJ6oonxHZMGPczTJj/RlN zBYA3iTFKi2IlDBXmhppKGiFH/EexVi5cQOiIqTc=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be [172.17.0.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F203)
In-Reply-To: <A85B0B81-842C-4826-BDEB-8A2124F33622@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:52:02 -0500
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra@ietf.org, anima-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte+ietf@cs.fau.de>, anima@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <77BE2D94-9701-417C-9703-BD6727A0FC4B@nostrum.com>
References: <156282703648.15280.17739830959261983790.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <17580.1562874933@localhost> <ACEB4033-707F-47AF-B58A-5227B444BEAB@cisco.com> <1692.1563030627@localhost> <A85B0B81-842C-4826-BDEB-8A2124F33622@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/KtRPotbVjWW3hH4y0PfpgGqylA0>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:52:17 -0000


> On Jul 15, 2019, at 02:39, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> To Adam’s broader point, there are at least several ways to approach this.  We can leave it to the vendor to decide which is correct, and we can continue to look to standardize ideas such as the one Michael had in the message I’m replying to now.

Yes; I think this is the important thing, and that specific mechanisms — if we believe they are useful to define — could be worked on later. 

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email