IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] WG input needed: Ben Campbell's question on GRASP (1)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 29 May 2017 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63171129485; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBcuW3_AcG0Z; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31DE712945A; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v4TMffOm096424 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 29 May 2017 17:41:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <afe91226-74fe-eae2-99ff-4091d15d2b47@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 17:41:40 -0500
Cc: draft-ietf-anima-grasp@ietf.org, anima-chairs@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B39BCF2B-B6A1-4A9B-9D14-79B987C18179@nostrum.com>
References: <149550272234.507.6666100470577050600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <afe91226-74fe-eae2-99ff-4091d15d2b47@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/LxjTf5aVfCEs-h510g8nimCcttU>
Subject: Re: [Anima] WG input needed: Ben Campbell's question on GRASP (1)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 22:41:45 -0000

> On May 28, 2017, at 10:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 23/05/2017 13:25, Ben Campbell wrote:
> ...
>> -7, Grasp Message and Options table: Why "Standards Action"? Would you
>> expect some harm to be done if this were only Spec Required?
> 
> Personal opinion: I see potential for harm. I could imagine that if
> GRASP is a success, then with experience we might be more relaxed
> about it, but for now I tend to be conservative about it. Of course,
> the WG may disagree…

If that’s the WG answer, I am perfectly happy. I just want to make sure people have thought about it.

Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email