IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-18.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 17 January 2019 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4C8130EED for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:31:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7GDShtZsQ2pv for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E825130E72 for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB03B3808A; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:30:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id E623DCA3; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:31:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C56C9F; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:31:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: anima@ietf.org
CC: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <154774712715.27334.5875299515697983815@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <154774712715.27334.5875299515697983815@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:31:34 -0500
Message-ID: <21558.1547749894@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/M1lhWrcwandC4J1aeks-adQQD_o>
Subject: Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-18.txt
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:31:38 -0000

internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-18

As I previously reported, we opened tickets for many of the issues that were
raised, and Max and I have been trying to work through the issues.  There
are enough of them that we haven't actually finished triaging them very well
yet, and wind up doing too much depth first work on a few issues.

This is going way slower than we'd like, and we are sorry about that.
We have posted -18 because it's been awhile, and we wanted to get feedback
on changes sooner rather than later.

Particularly the abstract, and introduction were changed slightly.
Section 8 was added and section 9.2.

The diffs above only deal with a few issues:
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/114
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/107
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/95
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/88
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/87
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/81
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/78
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/77

probably the following brings them all up:
    https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+label%3Awglc-review

if you like the changes, and it resolves your issue, it would be great if you
added the "reviewer-agrees" label (if github allows), or at least a THUMBS UP
(which I'm sure github will allow), or you can unicast us.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email