[Anima] [Errata Verified] RFC8995 (6716)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 19 October 2021 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963EF3A0912; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tC6zl0J0iosZ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07C9A3A08CC; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id D86CE132E67; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: pritikin@cisco.com, pritikin@cisco.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211019232211.D86CE132E67@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:22:11 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/N5VhlQNXzmeEVNsRjhoZIDhuqJY>
Subject: [Anima] [Errata Verified] RFC8995 (6716)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:22:21 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8995,
"Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6716

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Max Pritikin <pritikin@cisco.com>
Date Reported: 2021-10-19
Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG)

Section: 5.8.3

Original Text
-------------
A registrar MAY be configured to ignore (i.e., override
the above policy) the history of the device, but it is RECOMMENDED
that this only be configured if hardware-assisted (i.e., Transport
Performance Metrics (TPM) anchored) Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA)
[RFC5209] is supported.

Corrected Text
--------------
A registrar MAY be configured to ignore (i.e., override
the above policy) the history of the device, but it is RECOMMENDED
that this only be configured if hardware-assisted (i.e., Trusted 
Platform Module (TPM) anchored) Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA)
 [RFC5209] is supported.

Notes
-----
The logical expansion of 'TPM' in this parenthetical example is the Trusted Platform Module.

--------------------------------------
RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
Publication Date    : May 2021
Author(s)           : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG