Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP!

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 11 March 2020 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B807F3A010D for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.363
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.463, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pq3HtU7d1Kt6 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7313A0101 for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 02BJ8oAT013071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:08:52 -0400
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:08:50 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200311190850.GH98042@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <8e18470b-1d6a-19f1-efb2-bc2e72ef2665@gmail.com> <6011.1583935076@localhost> <CAHw9_iKved_kSmL4yd_fgbLqxpGoO=PU4cycuo1Y3wiHGcuk+w@mail.gmail.com> <9519.1583949504@localhost> <8be14529-54b0-7cea-b976-01c0c52eb343@gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJpVRjuRkxF9Hy_3AQ7wM48Gc45M3DZ1Siog0XiE9myeg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJpVRjuRkxF9Hy_3AQ7wM48Gc45M3DZ1Siog0XiE9myeg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/NiLBHpJoX7KY5SQsh4o3e0fl_rE>
Subject: Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP!
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:08:57 -0000

To confirm: I should not be waiting for any other reviews before I look at
the -38?  (What with it being outgoing-AD-season I can't promise an exact
date, but can bump it up the list a bit.)

Thanks,

Ben