Re: [Anima] [saag] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Sat, 27 June 2020 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031863A0CBB; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mFynQbu-asz7; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C61F23A0CB9; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9E148107B; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:01:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-23-5.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.23.5]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 37AE8480BDB; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:01:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:01:47 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Keen-Descriptive: 454fd1da55862d3c_1593234107584_3040401124
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1593234107584:2566361195
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1593234107584
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68C880022; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=2UG8g3ilcgqCNP rrniikSOxzUvA=; b=W2twSAMvdP0HHpl1/B2bMq9Y5/8zemOkW3/93buzYrjL1e siUOXviMbOukrKAMsxFY7NIXKBU3Uomj1sM2APXscm36w27JQmO1zYgqJbfOVlO+ tHcYt8WUgMonQqTdQnJ4nUH08gYmTpVqbbmF2+qEkB2XItCSxZL3JfSSIllnA=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 228BA80024; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 00:01:38 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a18
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, anima@ietf.org, saag@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200627050137.GA3100@localhost>
References: <20200624023407.GA41244@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <C71BDB46-A15A-48EC-BC4D-68CA9A7C1DFB@vigilsec.com> <14352.1593208951@localhost> <20200626220847.GX3100@localhost> <30682.1593220519@localhost> <20200627030622.GZ3100@localhost> <f40f9e49-085e-c9ac-8963-c7a4f972a44a@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f40f9e49-085e-c9ac-8963-c7a4f972a44a@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudelvddgledvucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftdektefhueetveeigfefgeejteejvdfhhefgvddtfeeujeehleeguefhgffhgfenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/PVAMrnQjOfDhNe_MKvQMA9or_C8>
Subject: Re: [Anima] [saag] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:01:51 -0000

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:05:41PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Interesting discussion but I want to see the ACP in the RFC Editor
> queue, can we just do what is required for that and nothing else?
> 
> I am about a millimetre away from proposing to recall the GRASP spec
> from the RFC Editor so that we can amputate its normative dependency
> on the ACP. I really wish I'd done that a year ago.

I don't follow GRASP, or ACP, so I've no idea what you're talking about,
but I don't see how this discussion could keep ACP from progressing.  In
particular, no one is proposing to update BCP14 and make that a prereq
for ACP progressing.

Nico
--