IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Anima] Why a 2nd Last Call ? Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24.txt> (An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)) to Proposed Standard

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 07 April 2020 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31B13A0C06; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 07:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=F7O1r9f2; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=BxGzqcJx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUhdwJTUxPbm; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 07:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56B73A0C0B; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 07:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4218; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1586271296; x=1587480896; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=aSFnFBOJSO5vcYpoHdFQB/9hnHOCYs/O3OwktKJDn6c=; b=F7O1r9f2r3pJOEiR5Vk0gY2Ix3RHhNyfXtM0PMqAQn5s45vBwSD68OzS kPPbS8Prjf2fb/PdU6FVj06VwD/ozJqLowA9hX3tCiRIpti8b+C0IrwWD oy1lNPepSEiSgw6iejkMiglifgnu0rjofozrcVjPlqTeDaO9/7nmS6sNC U=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:YGLONhUJp+TOlTD64zG5tRRv9XvV8LGuZFwc94YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSA92J8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTFdE7KdehAk8GIiAAEz/IuTtank3AtVEX1xo13q6KkNSXs35Yg6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ASCACuk4xe/5xdJa1mHQEBAQkBEQUFAYF7gVRQBWxYIAQLKoQcg0UDimiCX5ghglIDVAoBAQEMAQElCAIEAQGERAIXgW4kOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhXABAQEBFRERDAEBLAsBCwYBGQMBAgMCHwcCBDAUAQgKBAENBSKDBAGCSwMuAQ6lHgKBOYhidYEygn8BAQWBLwETQYM8GIINAwaBDiqMFh0agUE/gREnHIIfbIJnAgMBhHMygiyRC6AlCoI9BIdujz4dgk6IOZEAjzuJJpMCAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFXcBVlAYIKATNQGA2RIjiDO4UUhUF0gSmOKwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,354,1580774400"; d="scan'208";a="459865081"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 07 Apr 2020 14:54:55 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 037EssJN016080 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:54:55 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 09:54:54 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 09:54:54 -0500
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:54:53 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HbFhXSJ7AllS7/QA+0YB9Yvg65SVUA69UJZmdgxTMbA3AlhMlOTErgHqNfZAX9BfRXxei/WzDiSuJwhMw9tczD/ia15UCwJrhgrzai/Oj9nx6WgubGH31URuN7IrK/rYvTPwxHL+NgzY//3W9qHtMC0nVSVkXglfgIEySoLXhASxeP5SK9X7YG88HvVdv74Qf6tXkFpW+Kzmpz/ZeJmJxSAbTzsfuXPcci2k4bOpwbvnnJ/USgaxfwqP8xAnYJ47RtsPvb7Zx2bOctN6nGdUz/fBFR3UbQ4731aFLoNS7wjC9cem+Wbu/pl3+/EoTVEaxcXn72vxT4/PRP5s5j2lQw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aSFnFBOJSO5vcYpoHdFQB/9hnHOCYs/O3OwktKJDn6c=; b=hd9p+bC2Cx/19VG71Hqy2IwnXkdk1jd92KIvaxBTv3MMs9hQVyFtaHxmLjU1LgMVAzDQHzGQn9BhNwxfnmCAF4xG9mJI8tUVL9wPom7PkB1mOiel8SaY6un/dHS5ROJ2sreZ6juiP+XbT6/4IEOlIA1HDSEEUmNdfarL3C7cjULkhJdMuLwquYenGknHp/4BwAC20QCubWP5KWsGCUFbYdJUibx7OlVy3Mn2DeupFVikF1rQvvJiV9NKfiX2kfptzY/ajhMMYujokfrMmJ85hoOxp4/4U3ObEZ4iqU1Cz8+FlwHeer48fpBrp4Xij9mg2Mcj2PnHrNn5PyBCiFbJ5Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aSFnFBOJSO5vcYpoHdFQB/9hnHOCYs/O3OwktKJDn6c=; b=BxGzqcJxBRERfBbQtXPTredhOr6LEDb92YP9jvnPYHnBr/2NyVFhfe4hUiF3FvJ5Qkn2nublAqQCxgJq/8LfTdLbzMir4WfqjUegvUYWhdIkiinnVjq8ladekRk3woCDP1i93zrermnowO2Jq3uKk2eREiRwWKaBerIO9SmuN40=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1897.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:112::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.15; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:54:53 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2878.018; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:54:53 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Why a 2nd Last Call ? Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24.txt> (An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHWDOx+lc4BV6fNx0G5W/ItI5kPrw==
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 14:54:52 +0000
Message-ID: <431513E0-898B-487A-BFA0-91AFBFFCAD19@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:4828:6390:f5a3:8366]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6ab9906b-77e7-4601-b22d-08d7db03a115
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1897:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB18979B4E06A064F6ED3F9A37A9C30@DM5PR11MB1897.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 036614DD9C
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(5660300002)(6506007)(86362001)(36756003)(53546011)(33656002)(110136005)(54906003)(966005)(478600001)(316002)(2906002)(76116006)(4326008)(66946007)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(186003)(91956017)(6486002)(66446008)(8936002)(8676002)(81156014)(81166006)(71200400001)(6512007)(2616005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: DufaPvBU0XXkbYxelAh/6uY4ZqeZdFicWb3+/RqfmBOCpyDoL//w+ff/4Pzz8zE70YhnqDXgjrEm9/qtUp4K1UjD2JtGjfSIYqZ9M2R4ndZcDgIel7M1R9AtqPQf05tPFILNgL07gffyUW93lUYp9J39d9qIcqebb8PCYx4vMZawiII7koE7Xl5xXR0YU95MhYfHMo93Ss0qpUxsQKQsmg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1EF019CC5066CE439E2629323F8111E3@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6ab9906b-77e7-4601-b22d-08d7db03a115
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Apr 2020 14:54:52.8723 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: PcG4lah510VtgEhQ+iSCZV+tOEvKeek3fZX4HhzOVnVec3FPdrGf/PtCB+mI7oNeXIjc1vxjLlTrlen1m4yVKA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1897
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/PnUAnoe6_9mUUpEAyi38uhzqPxU>
Subject: [Anima] Why a 2nd Last Call ? Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24.txt> (An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 14:54:58 -0000

	
The previous IETF Last Call on this document was in February 2018 for revision -13. Since then, the authors have made substantive changes in the document and we are now at revision -24. The authors and myself believe that the document is ready for IESG evaluation but I, as the shepherding AD, consider that the amount of changes requires a new IETF Last Call.

Thank you for the review and thank you for the authors and the WG for the efforts put in this document

Best regards

-éric vyncke

-----Original Message-----
From: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> on behalf of The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Date: Tuesday, 7 April 2020 at 15:35
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "jiangsheng@huawei.com" <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24.txt> (An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)) to Proposed Standard

    
    The IESG has received a request from the Autonomic Networking Integrated
    Model and Approach WG (anima) to consider the following document: - 'An
    Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)'
      <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24.txt> as Proposed Standard
    
    The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
    comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
    last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2020-04-21. Exceptionally, comments may
    be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
    of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
    
    Abstract
    
    
       Autonomic functions need a control plane to communicate, which
       depends on some addressing and routing.  This Autonomic Control Plane
       should ideally be self-managing, and as independent as possible of
       configuration.  This document defines such a plane and calls it the
       "Autonomic Control Plane", with the primary use as a control plane
       for autonomic functions.  It also serves as a "virtual out-of-band
       channel" for Operations, Administration and Management (OAM)
       communications over a network that provides automatically configured
       hop-by-hop authenticated and encrypted communications via
       automatically configured IPv6 even when the network is not
       configured, or misconfigured.
    
    
    
    
    The file can be obtained via
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane/
    
    IESG discussion can be tracked via
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane/ballot/
    
    The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
    
       https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2407/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email