[Anima] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12

Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 08 October 2024 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: anima@ietf.org
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.8.251] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC01DC14F5EE; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172842376128.208.16885338382983056731@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 14:42:41 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: BZSC5TCRGWXDSQVUD56OF7SQ5Z7PM6AK
X-Message-ID-Hash: BZSC5TCRGWXDSQVUD56OF7SQ5Z7PM6AK
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Reply-To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [Anima] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/PxZmXfZ4qUpmdBDgmD-SmbHzisw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>

Reviewer: Yingzhen Qu
Review result: Ready

# OPSDIR review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in the last call may be
included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs
should treat these comments just like any other last-call comments.

Thanks for working on this document. It's clear to me, and I don't have any
comment from operational point of view.

Thanks,
Yingzhen