Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP!

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 11 March 2020 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E1C3A11D4 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id joWjLf0UNZng for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E3F3A120C for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id j15so2668127lfk.6 for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KvPCDYwNrp36k/OQ8nS0hbPzE61U2l2Ze45x9kiEVTk=; b=sra7ZPjDVG5Crp5ZUT4wYtCd++V2wXNy19RVpGzjYMOewl3LpIJdSO/eeZ5UNOL5zn GlVq1o5vLHD5T0lblJRzoAWFcr36OHyA2pcQqkp4JOeUqjcIHZO8MNm5Ovno/u/QyfJY n96kcwg90aGIrri0s0AJTLFpsTGqeaoVOg722dk459N/+t8745wLOp/+lgrOrno+lnmS z6MW1OT/wfH3swU7BePxt0MIVMAaYm9IIipYCTSUkW9zsfvC3YsXlrAjO+ZXtuGsWWzL CE19+pDftrSsGaPmRBqJx1ZmlhhtP1zSbSQPRLrfFcQd9Wa93ms2mPo4kXwu+p1N4Nqd T5SA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KvPCDYwNrp36k/OQ8nS0hbPzE61U2l2Ze45x9kiEVTk=; b=PAnMBzWWK7EYHBMaf50UxE/qO0VgR/WXo+pu8GnwVkEXIWIIABUQcSPstWvukzxrT5 Wu88HDviGzXCCE6d6ef8AYzmPYG/wR75wJ5PIOBY2Rl4eeKsWLiQd+sRl03wLf7ROaG1 6AbAEETYvChnxj/gCzT9/2zmcBosb/Mg+6SEajfNaD1UFUlPmCc/FvzMCiUQ19J+5C0w +yXjYocPmSvKJ6a7cN4Jc0wBcmgKFrYcfh9AKsQGgM8tVJf3VveEjOXmp0RD/C5d2PcL Gq6fEyrxwlZXmg7gYUI4tyo0VY14s9x6DLLADkZUxJYzaGOkASATe3tOdNTmWxFRUkHI dmoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2EFjECur8p+7WfaZuVlzdCIsbRn+4Epr2OCzVQfcZsy22dxWC4 9q1iLW9gXW9lexzGfe97hcspTSl6NL57H2TT+l6EKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vul7qtHZZXyW/d7L0oLVnQUoiivVHA1UJ9mslxN?= =?utf-8?q?wFrQbwzlNzATHx0b/uHNFcFcAaqFqV3C2eSDcF8USfL/deA=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:305:: with SMTP id t5mr2947156lfp.104.1583953303515; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8e18470b-1d6a-19f1-efb2-bc2e72ef2665@gmail.com> <6011.1583935076@localhost> <CAHw9_iKved_kSmL4yd_fgbLqxpGoO=PU4cycuo1Y3wiHGcuk+w@mail.gmail.com> <9519.1583949504@localhost> <8be14529-54b0-7cea-b976-01c0c52eb343@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8be14529-54b0-7cea-b976-01c0c52eb343@gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:01:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJpVRjuRkxF9Hy_3AQ7wM48Gc45M3DZ1Siog0XiE9myeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/QFHpTbtnYtNPb_aPCBQTFyoFOAk>
Subject: Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP!
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:01:55 -0000

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:00 PM Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the updates, and for BRSKI-38.

Indeed -- thank you for the new version.

W

>
> Regards
>    Brian
>
> On 12-Mar-20 06:58, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >
> > Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> >     > Unfortunately, I think there are still some inconsistencies in the
> >     > examples to resolve:
> >
> >     > The MASA cert/key is identical to the "manufacturer key pair for IDevID
> >
> > ...
> >
> > All fixed, Max Pritikin double checked them, which resulted in a sentence of
> > clarification, which I thought I posted on Monday, but I didn't actually.
> >
> > I think I did post -37 two weeks ago (Feb 26, I think) to the WG ML asking
> > for others to check my work before I bother Ben again.
> >
> > the one sentence fix:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-37&url2=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-38
> >
> > the new examples:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-37&url2=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-38
> >
> > --
> > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> >  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> >
> >
> >



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf