IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] [Ace] ANIMA and ACE, IDevID terminology (was: Re: cBRSKI)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 26 May 2023 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D75C151094; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gcYPmn6ICaoq; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92182C14F747; Fri, 26 May 2023 11:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E9D14C91A; Fri, 26 May 2023 14:17:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A13814C653; Fri, 26 May 2023 14:17:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <1CC393E9-6071-485E-A6AC-D6910561252C@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CA33DBE4-E69C-4EE9-9BC5-C9BD4529AF65"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 14:17:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <29682.1685121486@localhost>
Cc: anima@ietf.org, ace@ietf.org
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <15797.1682880092@localhost> <ZE7pCI1yiQ/200I+@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <15204.1682893914@localhost> <ZE+Pv0S2KqwtCO3/@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <ZFCijPd2M1qAnmrI@kduck.mit.edu> <ZFEbKeyVx34PAmnJ@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <29682.1685121486@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/RV95XCQYDmNXdwnEB6zXKoRphtI>
Subject: Re: [Anima] [Ace] ANIMA and ACE, IDevID terminology (was: Re: cBRSKI)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:17:17 -0000


> On May 26, 2023, at 1:18 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Is that identity now an LDevID (even though it has a completely
>> different shape than the IDevID), or is a certificate based LDevID
>> still created as part of the process, or can the device happily
>> complete the ANIMA processes without an LDevID?
> 
> I wouldn't call it an LDevID.
> You don't need to do EST and ask for an LDevID.

I do not see this being prohibited.  It would require:
- CA recognizes the trust anchor associated with the IDevID,
- CA can issue the LDevID,
- Client can authenticate the EST server based on something configured at the factory.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email