Re: [Anima] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>]

Hi Michael,

I have not seen a response to Tom Petch’s last email (copied in below).

Thanks,
Alissa

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: tom petch <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-28
> Date: October 29, 2019 at 7:49:39 AM EDT
> To: Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>, Last Call <[e-mail]>, Dan Romascanu <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> 
> Michael
> 
> I just saw -29 after my last message and it still needs work.
> 
> Appendix C confuses me.  The reference to it from IANA Considerations
> suggests that it is Normative but there is nothing in it to say that it
> is and my take is that by default it is Informational.
> 
> It contains a YANG module which
> - lacks references on import statements
> - lacks authors
> - lacks copyright
> - is not listed in IANA Considerations
> - has http: not https:
> - has a reference clause with a different title to that of the I-D
> - mixes URI and URL
> all in 35 lines :-)
> 
> The YANG module in s.3.4
> - references RFC8040 which is not in the I-D References
> - references
>  Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols
> whereas this I-D has a title of
>  Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)
> - has
>  // Grouping defined for future usage
> whereas the grouping is used in the previous YANG statement which leaves
> me puzzled
> - lacks YANG reference statements for
>          leaf proximity-registrar-cert {
> i.e. RFC5280, X.690, RFC8446
> - has [RFC8446] which looks like an XML/HTML anchor where a YANG module
> must be plain text
> 
> - IANA Considerations does not register either module, 3.4 or Appendix
> C, as per RFC6020 s.14
> 
> - Security Consideratrions does not include the required YANG
> considerations which in turn generates further Normative References
> 
> - Appendix A
> /The secification/The specification/
> 
> Tom Petch


> On Nov 26, 2019, at 3:29 AM, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Alissa, just a reminder that the -30 draft posted during IETF week
> resolves the Yang Doctor issue that you had raised.
>