[Anima] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-13: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document, may I also add that the text is easy
to read and understand?

Thanks also to Matthias Kovatsch for the exhaustive shepherd's write-up (noting
that the WGLC did not generate any comment...).

Thanks also to Eliot Lear, the IoT directorate reviewer, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12-iotdir-lc-lear-2024-09-16/

One minor quick comment though: is there any reason why the abstract uses
YANG-defined and the introduction YANG-based (both terms are weird though and
bring little value especially in the abstract) ?