Re: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 11 March 2020 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD3B3A08E6; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKrt2rSfct4d; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2343A0879; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5871154804E; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:45:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4C400440040; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:45:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:45:25 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "anima-ads@ietf.org" <anima-ads@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200311194525.GA56869@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <20200310203622.GF54522@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <16266.1583937453@localhost> =?utf-8?q?=3CBY5PR11MB4355F5FA7F231B3B979CF669?= =?utf-8?q?B5FC0=40BY5PR11MB4355=2Enamprd11=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CBY5PR11MB4355F5FA7F231B3B979CF669B5FC0=40BY5PR11MB?= =?utf-8?q?4355=2Enamprd11=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/TyzF5YxsSjKFewmv0iduyMEfjlQ>
Subject: Re: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:45:40 -0000

Thanks, Rob

Nobody replied to my concern on ietf@ietf.org that we will be running
out of time to potentially use the maybe preferrable existing WG slots
during the planned IETF107 week or that using those would create the least
overhead.

After all, WGs can perfectly well run webex without further
secretariat support, the only issue is what that webex can be called
("interrim", "ad-hoc", "emergency"), and how to capture the the meeting
for posterity.

I checked and it seems as if i can still perfectly well upload material
for ANIMA into IETF107 for example.

Cheers
    Toerless

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0000, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> Please hold off doing a poll until there are further details from the IESG on the plans for virtual meeting support.
> 
> Regards,
> Rob [wearing the incoming AD Hat]
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> > Sent: 11 March 2020 14:38
> > To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
> > Cc: anima@ietf.org; anima-ads@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima
> > meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)
> > 
> > 
> > Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> >     > I was suggesting on the IETF mailing list to also allow the option
> > to
> >     > have the virtual WG meeting at the pre-allocated WG time-slot(s)
> > during the
> >     > IETF107 week, especially because most attendees would hopefully have
> >     > that time slot available in their schedule, while later times may be
> >     > less easy to carve free.
> > 
> >     > If you have opinions about when we should have an anima WG webex
> >     > meeiting, please chime in. If you do prefer the time during IETF
> > week,
> >     > then maybe chime in to the discuss on ietf@ietf.org, otherwise,
> > please
> >     > or also have opinions here, or of coure always PM to
> >     > anima-chairs@ietf.org
> > 
> > If you must do somethin todayg, post a doodle poll (Yes/No/If-Needbe)
> > offering:
> > 1) both of the IETF107 week ANIMA time-slots
> > 2) some selection of China, PST/EST and Europe friendly slots in the two
> >    weeks afterwards.
> > 
> > From the results, consider having two 1.5 slots, one slot optimized for
> > each group of time zones.  Make sure that people enter If-Needbe if it
> > won't be during their "day".
> > 
> > --
> > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -=
> > IPv6 IoT consulting =-

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de