Re: [Anima] The open issue in draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Mon, 14 August 2017 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0365F124B0A for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 21:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WHzfAwVo8VAM for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 21:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89CC81241F5 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 21:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.77]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A92C58C4B1; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 06:47:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 7D1C4B0C898; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 06:47:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 06:47:23 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170814044723.GA31383@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <9fa5abbe-368d-1433-2ea8-f6622fd22573@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9fa5abbe-368d-1433-2ea8-f6622fd22573@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/Xo1wQ4NZWGE21z5ME9SqSYR4gHk>
Subject: Re: [Anima] The open issue in draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 04:47:32 -0000

Reaffirming my preference for 1.

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:17:21PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> As a reminder, we have two options in the draft for adding support
> of IPv4 prefix management:
> 
> 1. Add a version number flag to the objective
> 2. Add a second objective specific to IPv4
> 
> So far the preferences I have heard (including my own) are for option 1,
> because it's simpler to implement. I think the authors will go that way for the
> next version, but of course it's a WG choice. Comments please!
> 
> Quick link:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-04#section-5.2
> 
> Regards
>    Brian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima