Re: [Anima] Erik Kline's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 13 August 2020 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FE93A0C6A; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C0kB7fmg9lzv; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90ED93A0C67; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89360548621; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:16:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 7F866440059; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:16:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:16:59 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, anima-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20200813141659.GA47532@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <159730676576.12387.18205135091671983859@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLM-9Z4fFyu0i4btURq_ir0ttCv4R-0Y3h6av5SaLwAGQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLM-9Z4fFyu0i4btURq_ir0ttCv4R-0Y3h6av5SaLwAGQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/YVzS-2TWNQ8-5Cagyb_K_gM9WoA>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Erik Kline's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:17:07 -0000

Arghh... thats what an author like me deserves to get for not reading every bloody
formal language RFC line by line *sigh*.

Meaning i will remove the definition HEXLC and just use RFC5234 HEXDIG even though i
will keep lower case. Add a comment about preference to encode lower case but
need to absorb any case mix.

Thanks, Barry!

Toerless

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 08:33:28AM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:
> > [ section 6.1.2 ]
> >
> > * The example "fd89b714F3db00000200000064000000" contains an uppercase "F"
> >   and therefore doesn't conform to 32HEXLC, I believe.
> 
>      HEXLC = DIGIT / "a" / "b" / "c" / "d" / "e" / "f"
> 
> ABNF [RFC5234] is case-insensitive, so "f" in the grammar allows both
> "f" and "F" in practice.  So the example does conform to the grammar.
> That said, it's probably best to make the example internally
> consistent and use all lower case letters, even though mixing them is
> legit.
> 
> Barry

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de