[Anima] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-15

chen.ran@zte.com.cn Wed, 08 January 2025 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <chen.ran@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E33C151097; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:23:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ATktiqpJvk4u; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6C1C151073; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4YSVYJ6bTDz5B1K0; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:23:32 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4YSVXj02sfz4x5p1; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:23:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app02.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.116]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 5081MqUO075934; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:22:52 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from chen.ran@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:22:53 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 09:22:53 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa677dd36dffffffffd1c-b197d
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20250108092253508My96XI8LtI0_VVyo17hAU@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR10MB63544E9EBD634971404BDC26F3112@DB9PR10MB6354.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: 173624254702.2012441.1057660583683023730@dt-datatracker-65f549669d-2xld9,DB9PR10MB63544E9EBD634971404BDC26F3112@DB9PR10MB6354.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: chen.ran@zte.com.cn
To: steffen.fries=40siemens.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 5081MqUO075934
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 677DD394.000/4YSVYJ6bTDz5B1K0
Message-ID-Hash: WT4QQTLCCJP63YIF2PXVVHF3BXIP4IO4
X-Message-ID-Hash: WT4QQTLCCJP63YIF2PXVVHF3BXIP4IO4
X-MailFrom: chen.ran@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ops-dir@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-15
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/ZvB6SwLqP1STjOy2F7wSig7oFFc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Steffen,
looks good! Thanks.

Best Regards,
Ran


Original


From: Fries,Steffen <steffen.fries=40siemens.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: 陈然00080434;ops-dir@ietf.org <ops-dir@ietf.org>;
Cc: anima@ietf.org <anima@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm.all@ietf.org <draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm.all@ietf.org>;last-call@ietf.org <last-call@ietf.org>;
Date: 2025年01月07日 18:27
Subject: [Last-Call] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-15


Hello Ran,
 
Thank you for your review. We will address your points in the next draft update, which is currently in preparation.  
 
I put some more comments inline.
 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ran Chen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 10:36 AM
> To: ops-dir@ietf.org
> Cc: anima@ietf.org; draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org
> Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-15
>  
> Reviewer: Ran Chen
> Review result: Has Nits
>  
> This document extends the original BRSKI (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key
> Infrastructure) protocol by introducing a new operational mode—Pledge in
> Responder Mode (PRM). This extension is particularly useful in constrained or
> dynamic network environments where the traditional initiator-based workflow of
> BRSKI may not be feasible. It would be better to have a separate section for
> operational consideration.
[stf] Your comment emphasizes the comment we got from Mahesh during his AD review. We are currently working on an operational consideration section, which will on one hand summarizes some of the points mentioned in the architecture (section 5) and component (section 6) description but also provide further information.  
 
 
>  
> ## Minor
> For Normative References:
> I-D.ietf-netconf-sztp-csr updated to RFC9646.
[stf] already corrected
 
> Please pay more attention to I-D. draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis, which is still in WG
> draft status.
[stf]  some of the initial content from BRSKI-PRM regarding voucher enhancements was moved to RFC8366bis, so we are in constant exchange to ensure alignment.
 
>  
> Section 6.2.1
> The term described in rfc8995 is Slowloris-like attack, not Slowloris attack.
> It is recommended to change it to Slowloris-like attack.
[stf
-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@ietf.org