[Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP!

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 00:34 UTC

To: Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <8e18470b-1d6a-19f1-efb2-bc2e72ef2665@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:34:34 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/a86irZarfk0OoqaGLDdYgEkhTHc>
Subject: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP!
Precedence: list

Hi,

Could those on the hook for the ACP and BRSKI drafts, which have been very seriously delayed, update the WG with the plan for getting them approved? It seems to me that there has been endless nitpicking, of the kind that is appropriate for full Standard status, but very surprising for Proposed Standard where there is no expectation of perfection.

Can we expect these drafts to be approved in the next one or two weeks, for example? If not then, when?

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

[Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Michael Richardson
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Toerless Eckert
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Warren Kumari
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Michael Richardson
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Michael Richardson
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Warren Kumari
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Michael Richardson
Re: [Anima] We want BRSKI and ACP! Warren Kumari