IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Result of WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03 - Respond by July 28, 2017

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 01 August 2017 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA612131C84; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3FxIJ5qGFwx; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x235.google.com (mail-pf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC15F132301; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id o86so8467379pfj.1; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=48bcLC8P+I7Ak5paR+mvVLdodOKl5OZ0JwyG5sZzRqU=; b=bQO+TjvER8LateUMbj0iSXXZPw/6C8Qh36xsO3VRmvru9VUEpigXMCMDPeuB40EeZm uwGeuCFf0avcEwDVrRHP//MW+1AIULD10Sgnx0AEI/0fu4Di//ye6LNtaqaqPgV9IyIn of3V8qTNrA2wimgIKmunAv4ZdDdSLJoNZniVPEJa8AL7IdJT058SqWpm1aHASLOtS43z 0icLxxZsOyu9DPgAtNoNxk/XIOBYMICwqml3jl/8oB1X5hSxvt6YpFZOhEUCzhBDaXhs aH6Hy8HE9Z/uwMpxA1NDEFV+r2LbYtoQvDw06M507IuBPzE0S0nsGRCgD4mXuhq1qZp1 /bFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=48bcLC8P+I7Ak5paR+mvVLdodOKl5OZ0JwyG5sZzRqU=; b=Qqo8ghoVoAWm+q8fNGpwYoj6mrkTL/oTVAIJbH+AOO875d0SugPEqDYlam8SNV8HWV jArr5qhaCLCHph5ckgxwscE9usmkFQY0jc+sS5tXKz8SEKzepG8jxmi65VHEcBSvG7c7 K0encAAfkQ9jli1f9J1Ilk9JHgZtjPuBas6OQvj65zFEtoNSj0Ix/w3jA0bfkIkTio/y WsrwD8ecTP0vMr2uMkaLsTRoIF/vE3gnTTKPRUa8HpGPGHwwlsEBD7sROdpMwNNoOsqE 4nfNxOw5DOsDisDElK5qx05A/++PhtnSoldPJG6czwFjvK1OArFmve9/ys/XmJM8yf+V E9zA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113q87qkCqK822jVf1n0i4RgBkDIDJPWbfw33hMvRCorx7czFDEN mpiOU9yqiICdU1G6
X-Received: by 10.84.212.150 with SMTP id e22mr22227546pli.398.1501617465051; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:521f:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:521f:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q80sm45399566pfj.187.2017.08.01.12.57.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Cc: "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CE3D7BA@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <820cae24-23f3-2d26-1942-736694de08f5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 07:57:44 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CE3D7BA@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/b4guLG0jIrdh1X14JOYX6g06trA>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Result of WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03 - Respond by July 28, 2017
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 19:57:48 -0000

Just to be clear, the -04 version already published does *not*
deal with the comments in my review of -03:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/QCgeaEDFQlEgX_JsWzzjdWRNoHo

Regards
   Brian

On 01/08/2017 19:23, Sheng Jiang wrote:
> Hi, all
> 
> We received no negative response to the WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03 during the two-week WGLC and we did receive good reviews through the WG document stage, through the shepherd review process and WGLC period. Considering the past history of this work, I, with my ANIMA chair cap on, feel it is has passed the WGLC and should advance. This conclusion is made with the condition that the authors would solve the comments received during the WGLC and these modifications were not substantial changes from 03 version. If there are big changes, a shorter second WGLC may be needed.
> 
> Up to now, there is no IPR disclosure linked to this document.
> 
> Once the update is published and it meets the above condition, for which the second WGLC is not needed, as the document shepherd, I will finalize the shepherd document and send the document on.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Sheng (co-chair, Toerless who as a co-author stayed neutral on the content side)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email