Re: [Anima] [6tisch] Cross-WGs WGLC (second) on draft-ietf-anima-voucher-04 - Respond by Aug 08, 2017

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 02 August 2017 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA75312EC13; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 02:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53Nxox_1K-fa; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25863127978; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA75EE00C; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 05:44:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D981E8076D; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 05:42:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
cc: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, anima-chairs@ietf.org, 6tisch@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <76229c58f5d60d3a0c185c6645ba4355@xs4all.nl>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CE3D826@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <76229c58f5d60d3a0c185c6645ba4355@xs4all.nl>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 05:42:55 -0400
Message-ID: <7619.1501666975@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/bDAZ-Pwp5Q2FFyA-BDOkM2soCqk>
Subject: Re: [Anima] [6tisch] Cross-WGs WGLC (second) on draft-ietf-anima-voucher-04 - Respond by Aug 08, 2017
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 09:42:59 -0000

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> wrote:
    > section 6, leaf prior-signed-voucher, at the end:
    > The MASA SHOULD remove all "prior-signed-voucher".
    > I would encourage a "MUST" instead of a "SHOULD" when thinking of
    > transporting vouchers over constrained networks.

I believe that users of vouchers over constrained networks will want to
"sub-class" the voucher.  (I'm sure that's the wrong YANG term)
There will be an example of how to do this in BRSKI, so we don't need to do that.

    > Hope this helps

It does. Also proves you read every word.
We also accept patches via github :-)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-