Re: [Anima] pinned-domain-certificate and other BRSKI comments

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 14 July 2017 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD07131B75 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQQ00WRwp8PF for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78ACC131B74 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [62.168.35.69]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AADF1F8FB; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 13:16:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A4EEF59F; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:16:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
cc: anima <anima@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <e1195e60bbeccd2632ae368ef341c68d@xs4all.nl>
References: <9183.1499933298@dooku.sandelman.ca> <e1195e60bbeccd2632ae368ef341c68d@xs4all.nl>
Comments: In-reply-to peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> message dated "Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:21:49 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:16:41 +0200
Message-ID: <10708.1500038201@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/eCG7Hh1vaQIgRMiCYgjr3gR113c>
Subject: Re: [Anima] pinned-domain-certificate and other BRSKI comments
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 13:16:46 -0000

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> wrote:
    >> 4) >application/voucherrequest  The request is a "YANG-defined JSON<
    >>
    >> Is it reasonable that this is "format=pkcs7" (the default), and that
    >> we will grow/migrate via format=jwt or format=cwt?

    > What does "grow" mean?

I mean, extend the protocol through additional RFCs.



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-