Re: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10

[Peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>]

  Hi Spencer,

thanks for your kind words.

Indeed the answer is no. (at least for the coming 20 years).

Greetings and thanks,

Peter
Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker schreef op 2022-05-17 01:09:

> Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins
> Review result: Ready
> 
> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review 
> team's
> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were 
> written
> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the 
> document's
> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to 
> the IETF
> discussion list for information.
> 
> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider 
> this
> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
> [e-mail] if you reply to or forward this review.
> 
> This is a well-written specification. My only question - and I expect 
> the
> answer will be "no" - is whether there is any concern that sizes of the
> resources that are being passed around might exceed the MTU between the 
> pledge
> and the registrar, and whether there should be a mention of this 
> possibility in
> the specification.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Spencer