Re: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6EB3A0F9B; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=fBwFf34R; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=jTxqknU3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6h55eUya8UYj; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132C13A0FA7; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1787; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583948821; x=1585158421; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=p9MZg2jvw8CtXAWv+b7umFdc1CtdVNXuarCHgYvpQ8c=; b=fBwFf34Rkh4evInd76nLv6YqgBCnJCC/zNOaZi9imQs5XSYhx2BA81rT HWMXyZvQkdZh4RhDQ/bz9Yh1l5gYyHMSp51w5szI7StxOZktjq5oknDaV 7XV/BoDYJZLHKid5WYhjJlgFoiTaljbFvKtxfeUWenKlOTxBSua2c69UO o=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:TIdphBzJiKA47zvXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5YhSN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A1RJKa5lQT1kAgMQSkRYnBZufFkz/MPnsRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CbBQAII2le/5xdJa1mHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgXuBVFAFgUQgBAsqCodQA4ptgl+YFYJSA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGBT4J0AoINJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWDIVjAQEBAQMSKAYBASwLAQsEAgEIEQQBAQEeBQsyHQgCBAENBQgahU8DLgEDoAUCgTmIYoIngn8BAQWFIhiCDAmBOIwsGoFBP4ERR4JNPoEEAYNIg0GCLIJHiwsDDYtKlwYKgjyDOZBngmiCSogkkEyOfJtUAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFYcBU7gmxQGA2OHTiDO4pVdIEpinIEgS8BgQ8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,541,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="460258707"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Mar 2020 17:47:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BHl0Cv021915 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:47:00 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:47:00 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:46:59 -0400
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:46:59 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZWebQgfDLd5gLnjMNp4jai3O//d16ud5TwZxwu7bHG9YzC0d+1K/9asv3qxj0Lxtu0PvsSCKU88V/yuFBMkk/ns9cuOlAfkd3IubpSvW0sTfC02MtPTeDcN2hHmcaJcO+7x/WbMHSkcE1dJddWoZoGSLqzicmfcgP+I5bdMWEGuIP62Hy0zzbJG3EkeSrW/fmHVX6n/PRjFxJIIMY9EmgaOrpbq2ZxeRXi9Cl00OYkyEy1pkJmZCI7+PNWnEs/bJl4+oCNtjU+BZLBgEw+M/N6UMh1ZHYrmAFWkhKUvK+7/VKUVP+B+o5ulvUq0/XA/OLC7p4iIs+VfFvgAtbkXzSg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=ic50YQ+FzS1V0K6f1n9lf0ZTExiORuxcIgvsGRFEVV8=; b=hqlD60ksgIlSM7HfN9Mo1fwKELGv2diF96Oet1JP5A6/vrUVebIcQ2IPfXKbuiJrvaHRtcPx2auuIbuCH6CYcsHZ6Q7GqlpZeJ/qaKjkWRPZP95++pTc1L4zb7ynild7FQ7cMuY4sXo20zvQ/5WDz/KkZZTcmVJnN0Epr9ATMUsld9lxUvJ2g/Is9pchzXhAZOXGiil7Is8CEOUFEDjfV9OTLuEn0GCVksZ9X0RuiejxBdTUAh8jxhTppJC7nT0sAJJJQNTy73McUhtH8418IBn1qSjj6q5/2BJsSRq5gyqQFX7PEyS7rEzLk8VEbKgnKatQoBX4ydgDMuYVsZeJVw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ic50YQ+FzS1V0K6f1n9lf0ZTExiORuxcIgvsGRFEVV8=; b=jTxqknU3pQ10IzIWTWLXz7m/tq7Li+Y/yrdXdWGjCq4nY6p6bc4jGfspEYhKbKRAdW/qUH9mcMh0iN/fqTDVaeczkpOyokQlrE56y/XPILnnJc3jD3gehxZSoreOgqwsMWLMSrj1mnHHzuD7Oc1+vlrQJD7RuhOpWJu28O6DT2w=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c3::13) by BY5PR11MB4386.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1bc::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2793.17; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:46:58 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5434:7127:ff4b:e6f4]) by BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5434:7127:ff4b:e6f4%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2793.018; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:46:58 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
CC: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "anima-ads@ietf.org" <anima-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)
Thread-Index: AQHV97KpKUPpe8apj0aypoPSMXYuO6hDqBJA
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:46:57 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB4355F5FA7F231B3B979CF669B5FC0@BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20200310203622.GF54522@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <16266.1583937453@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <16266.1583937453@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.15.79.32]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6d989a66-27dd-457e-ac14-08d7c5e43230
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4386:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB43864798AF8BD4D7356622BCB5FC0@BY5PR11MB4386.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0339F89554
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(199004)(81156014)(8936002)(26005)(478600001)(66446008)(53546011)(81166006)(2906002)(8676002)(66476007)(316002)(64756008)(66946007)(52536014)(186003)(76116006)(66556008)(33656002)(5660300002)(86362001)(54906003)(9686003)(6506007)(110136005)(55016002)(7696005)(71200400001)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY5PR11MB4386; H:BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: GyvwF+UtS/+7DTu4vSl2iuAnNhfXdqio838GeYz1+k0cL34jPWC2xibw7CYGBEL3wZhkGFTXoRL3435cBBwzUFfYYvBflo4s7/wrP60obsUSNlPWPIYtymiTH8K3lQmq9SQbeBc+NqbI3z760pVetaFqeTpTibgC5BgADcb9YmbuVa0Kq7xIl2zjYg+p4EurPGTCKkI5lHtJ/8bzK6nWdIUjFR4gj/QBy83TQCqGA4RBWvhQuhR+OPaflRbxsAyomlFr8sYZ6FHXQAJZOorkN9B3tjoZ1FdkuPIXgvPGnjQnLUHAttEG7N8bLViqdmqaYTKdcoUlPviXvNhAodGyQczMPIDWNaj2EGdMyOGBP24zUS2yZ3emAIpJ8H4QpbiLkMqYIJ3xlVNLRk1kmI40sm7UOtkupqtv+b1aLRFTdOK1lzmpEs3uVKwgt37V3LTY
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: xNj2TYU2EIKQmn4Pf3HHUo6sTALVUPRGxptgA+c3iEvrZrL2zWic4tsvd90/E63/yRTIknxUwF0lOcNB/uNDeLr8mQftbpCL0/UHXcxIIvMWbMlmObt8nHvD9tAk7fWyWonOd5UMjHeZt/95OiSjig==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6d989a66-27dd-457e-ac14-08d7c5e43230
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Mar 2020 17:46:58.0101 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 9qgclOXUvdtcRYxsk5JJEvZlZEIo+0ZAdfKefL2QDZZcjQIi5cWUsHQ7+cAo2dWCnX5NfMQ43sLcaQutjBeOLQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4386
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/hLpQuBca-ClxFV_DvkGdfu1lmiM>
Subject: Re: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:47:07 -0000

Please hold off doing a poll until there are further details from the IESG on the plans for virtual meeting support.

Regards,
Rob [wearing the incoming AD Hat]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> Sent: 11 March 2020 14:38
> To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
> Cc: anima@ietf.org; anima-ads@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Anima] ANIMA: opinions about when to have webex anima
> meeting ? (IETF107 cancelled, now what ?)
> 
> 
> Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>     > I was suggesting on the IETF mailing list to also allow the option
> to
>     > have the virtual WG meeting at the pre-allocated WG time-slot(s)
> during the
>     > IETF107 week, especially because most attendees would hopefully have
>     > that time slot available in their schedule, while later times may be
>     > less easy to carve free.
> 
>     > If you have opinions about when we should have an anima WG webex
>     > meeiting, please chime in. If you do prefer the time during IETF
> week,
>     > then maybe chime in to the discuss on ietf@ietf.org, otherwise,
> please
>     > or also have opinions here, or of coure always PM to
>     > anima-chairs@ietf.org
> 
> If you must do somethin todayg, post a doodle poll (Yes/No/If-Needbe)
> offering:
> 1) both of the IETF107 week ANIMA time-slots
> 2) some selection of China, PST/EST and Europe friendly slots in the two
>    weeks afterwards.
> 
> From the results, consider having two 1.5 slots, one slot optimized for
> each group of time zones.  Make sure that people enter If-Needbe if it
> won't be during their "day".
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -=
> IPv6 IoT consulting =-