Re: [Anima] Handling of endpoint path names (from BRSKI-AE discussion today)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 26 August 2020 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08E33A0906 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7fb5hukCFrR7 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92E203A03EE for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4F7389A3; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xhy_MWimWCS0; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:18:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5F438992; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:18:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6FD86; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:39:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Werner\, Thomas" <thomas-werner@siemens.com>, "steffen.fries\@siemens.com" <steffen.fries@siemens.com>, "anima\@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR10MB195606BD9019E5E94244175DE7540@AM0PR10MB1956.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <3f2d1790efb44ac39405a23dc592dd89@siemens.com> <20200730161142.GB62130@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <12431.1596541563@dooku> <2c4323c817134845ae7c36b41fd239c1@siemens.com> <11029.1596647559@localhost> <eee14f13f5cf4183bf69e999c5fcea04@siemens.com> <6058.1597841627@localhost> <f3981ca4bde844dbb27213ae96185967@siemens.com> <AM0PR10MB195606BD9019E5E94244175DE7540@AM0PR10MB1956.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:39:42 -0400
Message-ID: <10490.1598470782@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/hYPNumwZXvvz4piiD4z7NcMJ1ok>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Handling of endpoint path names (from BRSKI-AE discussion today)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:39:49 -0000

Werner, Thomas <thomas-werner@siemens.com> wrote:
    > as already stated the renaming of the endpoints is just a cosmetic
    > issue, machines would not care about.  Nevertheless as this came up
    > now, I think the proposed changes are fine and should be included as
    > you already outlined: -

okay.

    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-08
    > With the result of two more characters "/est/" --> "brski", maybe the
    > draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher should shrink this part to
    > something like "/br/", "/brs/", "bki"?

yes, something like that, I agree.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-