IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 106, Singapore [ASAs]

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 12 October 2019 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD57512010F for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.436
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8S2W0urPU3C6 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54DAB1200B2 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (94-168-11-122.static.v4.ziggozakelijk.nl [94.168.11.122]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3970B1F456 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 21:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 2ED80834; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:02:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <b879b61a-2fc1-1c2f-8b27-f0b05ce1921d@gmail.com>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9299B9FAD2@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <b879b61a-2fc1-1c2f-8b27-f0b05ce1921d@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> message dated "Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:33:02 +1300."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:02:20 +0200
Message-ID: <1648.1570914140@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/htfnR2dX1_QikwhKXUk6d29r7kw>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 106, Singapore [ASAs]
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 21:02:23 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    > It seems time for the WG to discuss seriously what to do about the
    > environment for Autonomic Service Agents (ASAs). We could have this
    > discussion around an existing draft, but the main goal would be to
    > discuss what the WG needs to do in this area.

+1

I think that we need to spend some high-level time discussing what happens
next, now that we have completed the ACP work (ACP, BRSKI, architecture)

{Our AD tells me that BRSKI will return to the IESG at a call very soon}

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status