Re: [Anima] Cloud BRSKI discussion -- Option 1 use cases

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Wed, 27 November 2019 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6026A12083B for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:06:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QIT9kWDL2FLc for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E85C412012D for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (146.128-255-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk [62.255.128.146]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D5F1F47D; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:06:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 7F2F2C9B; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 22:06:20 +0800 (+08)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: "Owen Friel (ofriel)" <ofriel@cisco.com>
cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <MN2PR11MB3901B871673CD491B3089542DB450@MN2PR11MB3901.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9299B9FAD2@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <MN2PR11MB3901DD8CF27429ECAF1AA874DB780@MN2PR11MB3901.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <28576.1574580524@dooku.sandelman.ca> <9c60c895-9e14-c064-9f4a-306c5d7a1105@gmail.com> <1120.1574673282@dooku.sandelman.ca> <29988aee-9b8e-afab-1498-80dcf8b9f6fd@gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB3901B871673CD491B3089542DB450@MN2PR11MB3901.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Owen Friel (ofriel)" <ofriel@cisco.com> message dated "Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:57:12 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:06:20 +0100
Message-ID: <16230.1574863580@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/irCj14LTC7_mJ32HUmlLJ5pSFSU>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Cloud BRSKI discussion -- Option 1 use cases
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:06:19 -0000

Owen Friel (ofriel) <ofriel@cisco.com> wrote:
    >> > It is vendor specific, and it's baked in.
    >>
    >> Thanks. That was my working assumption, but I suggest stating it up front in
    >> draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud.

    > [ofriel] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-30#appendix-B states:

    > "   If no local proxy or registrar service is located using the GRASP
    > mechanisms or the above mentioned DNS-based Service Discovery
    > methods, the pledge MAY contact a well known manufacturer provided
    > bootstrapping server by performing a DNS lookup using a well known
    > URI such as "brski-registrar.manufacturer.example.com".  The details
    > of the URI are manufacturer specific.  Manufacturers that leverage
    > this method on the pledge are responsible for providing the registrar
    > service.  Also see Section 2.7."

So, maybe we should quote this literally in anima-brski-cloud's introduction.