[Anima] ACP SRV.est example
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 16 July 2019 16:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6987212022A; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sN_fssUmlE3u; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C120A120173; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44E13808A; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:58:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE50B52; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:58:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:58:20 -0400
Message-ID: <23875.1563296300@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/jmwRLDLnaM5jrNvQfLa2ANK6pfE>
Subject: [Anima] ACP SRV.est example
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 16:58:27 -0000
I suggest that EST servers are never on port 80, and are likely
on port 443, or another port.
6.1.4.1. GRASP objective for EST server
ACP nodes that are EST servers MUST announce their service via GRASP
in the ACP through M_FLOOD messages. See [I-D.ietf-anima-grasp],
section 2.8.11 for the definition of this message type:
Example:
[M_FLOOD, 12340815, h'fd89b714f3db0000200000064000001', 210000,
["SRV.est", 4, 255 ],
[O_IPv6_LOCATOR,
h'fd89b714f3db0000200000064000001',
TCP, 80]
]
Figure 3: GRASP SRV.est example
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Anima] ACP SRV.est example Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima] ACP SRV.est example Toerless Eckert