IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard

"Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com> Mon, 03 June 2019 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <steffen.fries@siemens.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE79120130 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 23:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H87dqr-booFu for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 23:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lizzard.sbs.de (lizzard.sbs.de [194.138.37.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECB712012C for <anima@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 23:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by lizzard.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x536YcFC017208 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:34:38 +0200
Received: from DEFTHW99ERKMSX.ww902.siemens.net (defthw99erkmsx.ww902.siemens.net [139.22.70.147]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x536YaA6002172 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:34:36 +0200
Received: from DEFTHW99ER6MSX.ww902.siemens.net (139.22.70.65) by DEFTHW99ERKMSX.ww902.siemens.net (139.22.70.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.435.0; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:34:35 +0200
Received: from DENBGAT9EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net ([169.254.12.220]) by DEFTHW99ER6MSX.ww902.siemens.net ([139.22.70.65]) with mapi id 14.03.0435.000; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:34:35 +0200
From: "Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com>
To: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHVEBsnSObOmAdIkUSiNyOqoj43mqaCPatwgAaHQYCAAMefwA==
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 06:34:34 +0000
Message-ID: <E6C9F0E527F94F4692731382340B337826FA5B52@DENBGAT9EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
References: <155847367546.2608.5031283783681425886.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E6C9F0E527F94F4692731382340B337826FA1C58@DENBGAT9EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net> <534d165e-536e-cc6d-f897-cb6f96a875fc@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <534d165e-536e-cc6d-f897-cb6f96a875fc@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-document-confidentiality: NotClassified
x-originating-ip: [139.22.70.50]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/k3Y8mkAQkBCNwrxy3L7MlCbBvsc>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 06:34:43 -0000

Hi Michael,

Yes, definitely. This would help. Thanks.

Best regards
Steffen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anima <anima-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: Sonntag, 2. Juni 2019 22:40
> To: anima@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures
> (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard
> 
> On 2019-05-29 11:06 a.m., Fries, Steffen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As this is the last call, it may not be to late to ask the question. I read the draft a couple of times and was stumbling upon the
> following:
> >
> > In Figure 1 of the BRSKI draft, for the communication between the Domain Registrar (RA) and the Key Infrastructure (CA), EST is
> stated.
> >>From my understanding of the description EST as enrollment protocol between an RA and the CA is meant exemplary but not
> prescriptive? From the protocol flow for the enrollment itself I understood BRSKI describes the flow until the Domain Registrar but is
> open regarding the protocol applied between the domain registrar and the CA. It may be EST.
> 
> Yes, it may. I don't think, other than the figure, we say anything else.
> Would an "e.g." in the figure help?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status